Concepcion v. Fidelity Investments, 2:18-CV-01561-JAM-KJN. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180606a55
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT FIDELITY'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT [LR 144(c)] JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Having considered Defendant Fidelity Workplace Services, LLC's Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, the Court hereby ORDERS: Good cause exists to grant Defendant's requested extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs' complaint. Therefore, Defendant's Ex Parte Motion is GRANTED. Defendant
Summary: ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT FIDELITY'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT [LR 144(c)] JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Having considered Defendant Fidelity Workplace Services, LLC's Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, the Court hereby ORDERS: Good cause exists to grant Defendant's requested extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs' complaint. Therefore, Defendant's Ex Parte Motion is GRANTED. Defendant'..
More
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT FIDELITY'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT [LR 144(c)]
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Having considered Defendant Fidelity Workplace Services, LLC's Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, the Court hereby ORDERS:
Good cause exists to grant Defendant's requested extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs' complaint. Therefore, Defendant's Ex Parte Motion is GRANTED. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's complaint shall be filed and served on or before July 3, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
