Hull v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-01003-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180608987
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a 14-day extension of time, from June 11, 2018 to June 25, 2018, to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that good cause
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a 14-day extension of time, from June 11, 2018 to June 25, 2018, to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that good cause e..
More
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a 14-day extension of time, from June 11, 2018 to June 25, 2018, to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.
This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that good cause exists for the requested extension because Defendant's counsel requires additional time to review and evaluate the sizeable administrative record, to consider the issues raised in Plaintiff's opening brief, to determine whether options exist for settlement, and to accommodate counsel's competing workload demands. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant's request for an extension of time.
ORDER
Based on the above stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the time for Defendant to serve a responsive brief shall be extended by fourteen days, from June 11, 2018 to June 25, 2018. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
