Brookins v. California, 1:17-cv-01724-LJO-JDP. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180615971
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 11) JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Barry L. Brookins is proceeding pro se on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 11.) Petitioner has not filed a response. The court will require a response to respondent's motion. Accordingly, 1. Petitioner must file a response to respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 11) within
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 11) JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Barry L. Brookins is proceeding pro se on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 11.) Petitioner has not filed a response. The court will require a response to respondent's motion. Accordingly, 1. Petitioner must file a response to respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 11) within 2..
More
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 11)
JEREMY D. PETERSON, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner Barry L. Brookins is proceeding pro se on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 11.) Petitioner has not filed a response.
The court will require a response to respondent's motion.
Accordingly,
1. Petitioner must file a response to respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 11) within 21 days of the service of this order. Under Local Rule 230(l), failure of the responding party to file a response may result in sanctions.
2. Respondent may file a reply in support of his motion within 7 days of the service of petitioner's response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
