Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2:16-cv-02960-MCE-DB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180615a70
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EPA'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiffs Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works ("SCAP"), Central Valley Clean Water Association ("CVCWA"), and Bay Area Clean Water Agencies ("BACWA"), and Defendants United States Environmental Protection Agency and Acting Regional Administrator Alexis Strauss (collectively, "EPA"), through their respective attorne
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EPA'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiffs Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works ("SCAP"), Central Valley Clean Water Association ("CVCWA"), and Bay Area Clean Water Agencies ("BACWA"), and Defendants United States Environmental Protection Agency and Acting Regional Administrator Alexis Strauss (collectively, "EPA"), through their respective attorney..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EPA'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works ("SCAP"), Central Valley Clean Water Association ("CVCWA"), and Bay Area Clean Water Agencies ("BACWA"), and Defendants United States Environmental Protection Agency and Acting Regional Administrator Alexis Strauss (collectively, "EPA"), through their respective attorneys, respectfully stipulate to extend the time period for Plaintiffs' response to EPA's motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") [ECF No. 42] and EPA's reply as indicated below. The Court has vacated the hearing on EPA's motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, so the proposed briefing schedule will not affect the hearing schedule. [ECF No. 43]
Proposed Briefing Schedule Current Proposed
Plaintiffs' Opposition June 14, 2018 August 3, 2018
EPA's Reply June 21, 2018 August 20, 2018
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
