Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

C.C. ex rel. A.C. v. Rocklin Unified School District, 2:17-cv-02645-MCE-AC. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180618596 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES; ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiffs C.C., A.C., and M.C. ("Plaintiffs") and defendant Rocklin Unified School District ("Defendant" and, collectively with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint and/or Motion for a More Definite Statement on May 3, 2018 ( see ECF. D
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES; ORDER

Plaintiffs C.C., A.C., and M.C. ("Plaintiffs") and defendant Rocklin Unified School District ("Defendant" and, collectively with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint and/or Motion for a More Definite Statement on May 3, 2018 (see ECF. Doc. 7-1), with a scheduled hearing date of May 31, 2018, which was subsequently vacated by the Court;

2. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Notice with the Court on May 17, 2018, (see ECF. Doc. 10) stating that Plaintiffs would not be filing an opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and/or Motion for a More Definite Statement, but instead would file a First Amended Complaint ("FAC");

3. WHEREAS, on May 24, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their FAC (see ECF. Doc. 11);

4. WHEREAS, Defendant intends to file a Motion to Dismiss the FAC;

5. WHEREAS, the Parties are interested in preventing the accrual of unnecessary costs and expenses with regard to initial disclosures, in light of Defendant's intent to file a Motion to Dismiss the FAC, which the Parties acknowledge could result in the dismissal of the subject action, in its entirety.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(C), the Parties jointly request and HEREBY STIPULATE that the deadline for initial disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) for this action be extended to thirty (30) days after this Court issues its ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the FAC.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the Parties to exchange initial disclosures shall be extended to thirty (30) days after this Court issues a ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the FAC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer