Mann v. DHO ICE, 1:18-cv-00485-EPG-HC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180619665
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 that challenges Petitioner's prolonged detention and requests the Court "to extradite me or to release me from detention on supervision as before until my travel document[s] bec[o]me available for my extradition." (ECF No. 1 at 8). 1 On June 8, 2018, Respondent filed a response to th
Summary: ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 that challenges Petitioner's prolonged detention and requests the Court "to extradite me or to release me from detention on supervision as before until my travel document[s] bec[o]me available for my extradition." (ECF No. 1 at 8). 1 On June 8, 2018, Respondent filed a response to the..
More
ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 that challenges Petitioner's prolonged detention and requests the Court "to extradite me or to release me from detention on supervision as before until my travel document[s] bec[o]me available for my extradition." (ECF No. 1 at 8).1
On June 8, 2018, Respondent filed a response to the petition. (ECF No. 8). As the Department of Homeland Security has indicated that there is a likelihood of the issuance of a travel document based on prior experience in other Indian travel document cases, Respondent proposes filing a supplemental response within sixty days if no travel document has yet been received. (ECF No. 8 at 3-4).
On June 5, 2018, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granted a motion for class certification of 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(6) detainees in the Ninth Circuit and enjoined the government from detaining class members for more than 180 days without providing each a bond hearing before an immigration judge as required by Diouf v. Napolitano, 634 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez v. Sessions, No. 3:18-cv-01869-JSC, 2018 WL 2688569 (N.D. Cal. June 5, 2018).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. On or before August 10, 2018, Respondent SHALL FILE a supplemental response with any new information relevant to the obtainment of the travel document and that also addresses the class action and injunction referenced above.
2. Petitioner may file a reply within THIRTY (30) days of the date of service of Respondent's supplemental response.
IT IS SO ORDERED..
FootNotes
1. Page numbers refer to the ECF page numbers stamped at the top of the page.
Source: Leagle
