U.S. v. Sigala, 1:18-cr-00046-DAD-BAM-1. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180621968
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2018
Summary: REQUEST FOR RULE 43 WAIVER OF APPEARANCE; ORDER BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43(b)(3), Jesus Sigala, having been advised of his right to be present at all stages of the proceedings, hereby requests that this Court permit him to waive his right to personally appear at all non-substantive proceedings. Mr. Sigala agrees that his interests shall be represented at all times by the presence of his attorney, the Office of the Federal Defe
Summary: REQUEST FOR RULE 43 WAIVER OF APPEARANCE; ORDER BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43(b)(3), Jesus Sigala, having been advised of his right to be present at all stages of the proceedings, hereby requests that this Court permit him to waive his right to personally appear at all non-substantive proceedings. Mr. Sigala agrees that his interests shall be represented at all times by the presence of his attorney, the Office of the Federal Defen..
More
REQUEST FOR RULE 43 WAIVER OF APPEARANCE; ORDER
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43(b)(3), Jesus Sigala, having been advised of his right to be present at all stages of the proceedings, hereby requests that this Court permit him to waive his right to personally appear at all non-substantive proceedings. Mr. Sigala agrees that his interests shall be represented at all times by the presence of his attorney, the Office of the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California, the same as if he were personally present, and requests that this Court allow his attorney-in-fact to represent his interests at all times.
ORDER
Defendant's request for a waiver of appearance is granted. Pursuant to Rule 43(b)(3), defendant's appearance is waived at all non-substantive pretrial proceedings until further order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
