Acosta v. Cortez, 1:18-cv-00236-DAD-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180622970
Visitors: 25
Filed: Jun. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 11) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On June 19, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Acosta and Defendants John J. Cortez, individually and dba Easton Auto Parts, and Rebecca S. Cortez filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 11). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 6
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 11) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On June 19, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Acosta and Defendants John J. Cortez, individually and dba Easton Auto Parts, and Rebecca S. Cortez filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 11). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 68..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 11)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
On June 19, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Acosta and Defendants John J. Cortez, individually and dba Easton Auto Parts, and Rebecca S. Cortez filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 11). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
