Jones v. Gastelo, 1:18-cv-00493-JDP. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180626929
Visitors: 25
Filed: Jun. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Alvin Bernard Jones is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Respondent moves for a 60-day extension to file a response, citing respondent's counsel's caseload. (Doc. No. 14.) The issues raised in the petition are not unusually complicated. The court will grant a 30-day extension. Accordingly, 1. Respondent's mo
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Alvin Bernard Jones is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Respondent moves for a 60-day extension to file a response, citing respondent's counsel's caseload. (Doc. No. 14.) The issues raised in the petition are not unusually complicated. The court will grant a 30-day extension. Accordingly, 1. Respondent's mot..
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
JEREMY D. PETERSON, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner Alvin Bernard Jones is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent moves for a 60-day extension to file a response, citing respondent's counsel's caseload. (Doc. No. 14.) The issues raised in the petition are not unusually complicated. The court will grant a 30-day extension.
Accordingly,
1. Respondent's motion for an extension to respond to the petition (Doc. No. 14) is granted in part and denied in part.
2. Respondent's response is due Thursday, July 26, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
