Lipsey v. Reddy, 1:17-cv-00569-LJO-BAM (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180627795
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE [Doc. 52, 53] BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On June 12, 2018, the Court ordered Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's request for a settlement conference in this case. (Doc. 52.) Currently before the Court is Defendants' response, in which they state that due to a pending motion which may resolve the case in its entirety, they do not desire a settlement conference. (Doc. 53.) Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's request
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE [Doc. 52, 53] BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On June 12, 2018, the Court ordered Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's request for a settlement conference in this case. (Doc. 52.) Currently before the Court is Defendants' response, in which they state that due to a pending motion which may resolve the case in its entirety, they do not desire a settlement conference. (Doc. 53.) Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's request t..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE [Doc. 52, 53]
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
On June 12, 2018, the Court ordered Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's request for a settlement conference in this case. (Doc. 52.) Currently before the Court is Defendants' response, in which they state that due to a pending motion which may resolve the case in its entirety, they do not desire a settlement conference. (Doc. 53.)
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's request to schedule a settlement conference is HEREBY DENIED. This order does not preclude any future, joint requests for a settlement conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
