Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Instituut Voor Landbouw-En Visserijonderzoek, 17-cv-00808-DAD-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180627800 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSES TO COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 96) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6, Plaintiffs E & J Gallo Winery, doing business as San Joaquin Valley Concentrates, G3 Enterprises, Inc., and MCD Technologies Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants Instituut Voor Landbouw-En Visserijonderzoek and Eigen Vermogen VH Instituut Voor Landbouw-En V
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSES TO COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 96)

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6, Plaintiffs E & J Gallo Winery, doing business as San Joaquin Valley Concentrates, G3 Enterprises, Inc., and MCD Technologies Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants Instituut Voor Landbouw-En Visserijonderzoek and Eigen Vermogen VH Instituut Voor Landbouw-En Visserijonderzoek (together, "Defendants") hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in the above-captioned action on June 15, 2017 (Dkt. 1);

WHEREAS, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on October 17, 2017 (Dkt. 27);

WHEREAS, on June 1, 2018, the Court entered an order granting-in-part and denying-in-part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, which directed Plaintiffs "to file and serve any amended complaint no later than thirty days from the issuance of [the] order" (Dkt. 86);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs' deadline to file an amended complaint, if any, is July 2, 2018;1

WHEREAS, by stipulation of the parties (Dkt. 94), Defendants' current deadline to prepare and file their responsive pleading to the Complaint is June 29, 2018;

WHEREAS, on June 20, 2018, Plaintiffs notified counsel for Defendants that Plaintiffs intend to file an amended complaint on or before July 2, 2018, pursuant to the Court's order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that it is unnecessary for Defendants to prepare and file a responsive pleading to the Complaint on June 29, 2018, in view of Plaintiffs' intent to file a new amended complaint three days later, which will require a separate response from Defendants within fourteen days of service under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3);

WHEREAS, in light of the Fourth of July holiday, Defendants seek additional time to review and respond to any amended complaint filed by Plaintiffs; and

WHEREAS, the further extensions of time stipulated herein will not alter any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order;

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED that:

1. The deadline for Defendants to file and serve a responsive pleading to the existing Complaint shall be extended to July 16, 2018, which is two weeks after Plaintiffs' deadline to file an amended complaint; and

2. If Plaintiffs file an amended complaint on or prior to July 2, 2018, Defendants' deadline to file and serve a responsive pleading to the amended complaint shall be extended to July 23, 2018, which is three weeks after Plaintiffs' deadline to file an amended complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Thirty days from the issuance of the Court's order is July 1, 2018, which is a Sunday, so Plaintiffs' deadline is extended to the next court day, July 2.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer