Filed: Jun. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiff JOSEPH SLADE ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective counsel of record, as follows: WHEREAS, on March 22, 2018, the Court entered an Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, which states that all discovery shall be completed by January 9, 2019 (ECF No. 5); WH
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiff JOSEPH SLADE ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective counsel of record, as follows: WHEREAS, on March 22, 2018, the Court entered an Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, which states that all discovery shall be completed by January 9, 2019 (ECF No. 5); WHE..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiff JOSEPH SLADE ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective counsel of record, as follows:
WHEREAS, on March 22, 2018, the Court entered an Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, which states that all discovery shall be completed by January 9, 2019 (ECF No. 5);
WHEREAS, the Parties have scheduled a private mediation of this action for August 29, 2018 with Denise Asher, Esq.;
WHEREAS, despite Defendant's diligence in conducting discovery, the Defendant needs additional time to respond to Plaintiff's requests for written discovery;
WHEREAS, this Joint Stipulation is not entered into with the intent to delay. By extending Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's requests for written discovery, Plaintiff is not prejudiced and the Court's Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order does not require modification;
WHEREAS, good cause exists for granting the Parties' request to extend the following deadline in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29 and Local Rule 143:
Event Original Deadline Request Deadline
Defendant's deadline to
respond to Plaintiff's
written discovery June 25, 2018 July 9, 208
requests
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
