Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pickard v. Berryhill, 2:16-cv-01545-JAM-CMK. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180629d03 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(D) JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff will be awarded attorney fees in the amount of ten thousand six hundred seventy-five dollars and sixteen cents ($10,675.16) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d). This amount
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(D)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff will be awarded attorney fees in the amount of ten thousand six hundred seventy-five dollars and sixteen cents ($10,675.16) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d); 1920.

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the Defendant will consider any assignment of EAJA fees to David J. Linden. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010), the ability to honor any such assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the Defendant will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to be made directly to David J. Linden, pursuant to any assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to David J. Linden.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer