Filed: Jun. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to the motion of the Plaintiff, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC"), and for good cause shown, the Court finds that the Consent Decree between DTSC, and the Defendant, the United States of America, is fair, reasonable, and consistent with the objectives of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675. Accordingly, the Consent Decree as a
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to the motion of the Plaintiff, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC"), and for good cause shown, the Court finds that the Consent Decree between DTSC, and the Defendant, the United States of America, is fair, reasonable, and consistent with the objectives of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675. Accordingly, the Consent Decree as at..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Pursuant to the motion of the Plaintiff, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC"), and for good cause shown, the Court finds that the Consent Decree between DTSC, and the Defendant, the United States of America, is fair, reasonable, and consistent with the objectives of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675. Accordingly, the Consent Decree as attached hereto is approved and entered as a judgment of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED.
