U.S. v. Kamar, 1:13-cr-00429-DAD-BAM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180706668
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. This matter is currently set for an evidentiary hearing regarding competency on September 4, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. 2. The parties agree to allow the government additional time to respond to the defendant's brief and rebuttal of
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. This matter is currently set for an evidentiary hearing regarding competency on September 4, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. 2. The parties agree to allow the government additional time to respond to the defendant's brief and rebuttal of t..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. This matter is currently set for an evidentiary hearing regarding competency on September 4, 2018, at 1:30 p.m.
2. The parties agree to allow the government additional time to respond to the defendant's brief and rebuttal of the government's expert. Accordingly, the parties agree to allow the government to submit its brief on or before July 27, 2018.
3. The parties further agree to allow the defendant to file a responsive brief on or before August 24, 2018.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Having reviewed the stipulation of the parties,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
