Alvarado v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-00662-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180706681
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF REMAND (ECF No. 24) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation by the parties, through their respective counsel (ECF No. 24), This action is remanded for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Council is to remand this case to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for a new decision. On remand, the ALJ is to be instructed to obtain suppleme
Summary: ORDER OF REMAND (ECF No. 24) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation by the parties, through their respective counsel (ECF No. 24), This action is remanded for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Council is to remand this case to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for a new decision. On remand, the ALJ is to be instructed to obtain supplemen..
More
ORDER OF REMAND (ECF No. 24)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to the stipulation by the parties, through their respective counsel (ECF No. 24),
This action is remanded for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), sentence four.
On remand, the Appeals Council is to remand this case to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for a new decision. On remand, the ALJ is to be instructed to obtain supplemental vocational evidence in order to determine whether Plaintiff can perform other work at Step 5.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
