Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:17-cv-01343-JDP. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180706686
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2018
Summary: SECOND ORDER ADOPTING PARTIES' PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (No. 17). JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Dorette Gale Jenkins has requested her second extension of time to file an opening brief, citing her counsel's caseload. Defendant Commissioner of Social Security does not object and the parties have jointly proposed a briefing schedule. (Doc. No. 17.) The administrative law judge found that plaintiff had not engaged in substantial gainful activity since January 8, 2008. (Do
Summary: SECOND ORDER ADOPTING PARTIES' PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (No. 17). JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Dorette Gale Jenkins has requested her second extension of time to file an opening brief, citing her counsel's caseload. Defendant Commissioner of Social Security does not object and the parties have jointly proposed a briefing schedule. (Doc. No. 17.) The administrative law judge found that plaintiff had not engaged in substantial gainful activity since January 8, 2008. (Doc..
More
SECOND ORDER ADOPTING PARTIES' PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (No. 17).
JEREMY D. PETERSON, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Dorette Gale Jenkins has requested her second extension of time to file an opening brief, citing her counsel's caseload. Defendant Commissioner of Social Security does not object and the parties have jointly proposed a briefing schedule. (Doc. No. 17.) The administrative law judge found that plaintiff had not engaged in substantial gainful activity since January 8, 2008. (Doc. No. 10-3, at 21.) The court will adopt the parties' proposal, but the parties should show good cause before seeking another extension.
Accordingly,
1. The parties' request to amend the briefing schedule (Doc. No. 17) is granted.
2. Plaintiff's opening brief is due on Friday, July 13, 2018.
3. Defendant's response is due on Monday, August 13, 2018.
4. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due on Tuesday, August 28, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
