Filed: Jul. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Amanda Beck, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Steven B. Plesser, attorney for defendant Patrick, and Daniel Olsen, attorney for defendant Gordon, that the status conference currently set for July 12, 2018 should be continued until August 16, 2018, at
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Amanda Beck, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Steven B. Plesser, attorney for defendant Patrick, and Daniel Olsen, attorney for defendant Gordon, that the status conference currently set for July 12, 2018 should be continued until August 16, 2018, at 9..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Amanda Beck, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Steven B. Plesser, attorney for defendant Patrick, and Daniel Olsen, attorney for defendant Gordon, that the status conference currently set for July 12, 2018 should be continued until August 16, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., and to exclude time between July 12, 2018 and August 16, 2018, under Local Code T4.
The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
1. The government has provided significant discovery associated with this case (i.e. approximately 900 pages, plus video, audio and photos), to defense counsel;
2. Counself for defendant Patrick was only recently substituted in as counsel, replacing the Federal Defender, and did not receive Patrick's file from the Federal Defender until 7/5/18. Both counsel require additional time to review discovery, confer with their client, investigate possible defenses, and to discuss possible resolution with the Government.
3. Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
4. The government joins in the request for the continuance.
5. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
7. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FINDINGS And ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.
