Mendoza v. Exide Technologies, Inc., 1:17-cv-01104-LJO-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180713827
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 15) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On July 10, 2018, Plaintiff Francisco Mendoza and Defendant Exide Technologies, Inc., filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 15). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Cle
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 15) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On July 10, 2018, Plaintiff Francisco Mendoza and Defendant Exide Technologies, Inc., filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 15). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Cler..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 15)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
On July 10, 2018, Plaintiff Francisco Mendoza and Defendant Exide Technologies, Inc., filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 15). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
