Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ardds v. Constancio, 2:17-cv-0679-WBS-EFB P. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180713876 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . After this civil rights action was closed pursuant to the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal with prejudice, see ECF Nos. 41, 42, plaintiff filed a declaration "in support [of] ex parte motion and objection to magistrate judge's findings and recommendations," a declaration "in support of notice to the office of the clerk," and a declaration "in support of ex parte motion and supported evidence exhibits to support needed temporary restr
More

ORDER

After this civil rights action was closed pursuant to the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal with prejudice, see ECF Nos. 41, 42, plaintiff filed a declaration "in support [of] ex parte motion and objection to magistrate judge's findings and recommendations," a declaration "in support of notice to the office of the clerk," and a declaration "in support of ex parte motion and supported evidence exhibits to support needed temporary restraining order," see ECF Nos. 44, 45, 46. The court takes no action on plaintiff's filings as this case is now closed.1 Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

So ordered.

FootNotes


1. To the extent plaintiff requests copies of this court's prisoner civil rights complaint form (ECF No. 45), however, the request will be granted.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer