Moya v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc., 1:18-CV-00229-LJO JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180719929
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . When the Court stayed the case, upon the stipulation of the parties, it ordered, "Within 120 days and every 120 days thereafter and within 14 days of the final determination of the arbitration, the parties and counsel SHALL file a report detailing the status of the matter and whether the stay should be lifted." (Doc. 7) However, 120 da
Summary: ORDER TO THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . When the Court stayed the case, upon the stipulation of the parties, it ordered, "Within 120 days and every 120 days thereafter and within 14 days of the final determination of the arbitration, the parties and counsel SHALL file a report detailing the status of the matter and whether the stay should be lifted." (Doc. 7) However, 120 day..
More
ORDER TO THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
When the Court stayed the case, upon the stipulation of the parties, it ordered, "Within 120 days and every 120 days thereafter and within 14 days of the final determination of the arbitration, the parties and counsel SHALL file a report detailing the status of the matter and whether the stay should be lifted." (Doc. 7) However, 120 days have passed, and the parties failed to report. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
1. Within 10 days, the parties SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court's order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
