City of Sacramento v. Altstatt, 2:17-cv-2029 JAM DB PS. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180719972
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Defendant is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On May 22, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendatio
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Defendant is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On May 22, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendation..
More
ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Defendant is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On May 22, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. Defendant has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 22, 2018 (ECF No. 10) are adopted in full;
2. This action is summarily remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court; and
3. This case is closed.
Source: Leagle
