Bailey v. Berryhill, : 2:17-cv-02360-JAM-CMK. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180719985
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 49 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 49 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The current due date is July 18, 2018. The new due date will be September 5, 2018. This is Defendant's first
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 49 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 49 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The current due date is July 18, 2018. The new due date will be September 5, 2018. This is Defendant's first ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 49 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 49 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The current due date is July 18, 2018. The new due date will be September 5, 2018.
This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time in this case. There is good cause for this request. Since the filing of Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, Defendant's counsel has been diligently addressing her full workload of district court cases and other cases that could not be assigned to another attorney. Furthermore, Defendant's counsel will be on approved leave for approximately four weeks from July to August.
Thus, Defendant is respectfully requesting additional time up to and including September 5, 2018, to fully review the record and research the issues presented by Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in this case. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
