Washington v. Gamboa, 1:17-cv-00302-LJO-EPG (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180720743
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BE GRANTED (Doc. Nos. 33, 36) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Jesse Washington ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 8, 2018, H. Gamboa
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BE GRANTED (Doc. Nos. 33, 36) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Jesse Washington ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 8, 2018, H. Gamboa ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BE GRANTED (Doc. Nos. 33, 36)
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
Jesse Washington ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 8, 2018, H. Gamboa and R. Roque ("Defendants") filed a motion for judgment on the pleading as to all state law claims asserted in this action. (Doc. No. 33). Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. (Doc. No. 35). On May 1, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted. (Doc. No. 36). The findings and recommendations directed the parties to file any objections within fourteen days of service thereof. Id. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly,
1. The findings and recommendations issued May 1, 2018, (Doc. No. 36), are adopted in full;
2. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleading as to all state law claims, (Doc. No. 33), is granted; and
3. This case is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
