Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rocco v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00141-CKD. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180720819 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 23, 2018, to September 3, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because S. Wyeth McAdam, the attorney a
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 23, 2018, to September 3, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because S. Wyeth McAdam, the attorney assigned the primary responsibility for drafting any opposition or counter-motion, was unable to complete her opposition because she was assisting with hospice care of her father-in-law who recently died.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Counsel apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer