Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. ex rel. Markus v. Aerojet RocketDyne Holdings, Inc., 2:15-cv-02245-WBS-AC. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180730a33 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. AND AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation to Further Extend Time for Defendants Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. and Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. (hereinafter, "Defendants") to Answer or Otherwise Respond to First Amended Complaint (the "Joint Stipulation"
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. AND AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

This matter comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation to Further Extend Time for Defendants Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. and Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. (hereinafter, "Defendants") to Answer or Otherwise Respond to First Amended Complaint (the "Joint Stipulation"). The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation and, good cause appearing, GRANTS the Joint Stipulation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is extended by sixty (60) calendar days, through and including September 28, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer