Bell v. Martel, 2:17-cv-0063 MCE CKD P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180801942
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 20, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion for discovery that is currently pending before the court. ECF No. 31. However, the Discovery and Scheduling Order issued on June 21, 2018 stated that all discovery requests are to be served on the attorney for defendants and are not to be filed with the court. ECF No. 29 at 4. Accordingly, IT IS H
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 20, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion for discovery that is currently pending before the court. ECF No. 31. However, the Discovery and Scheduling Order issued on June 21, 2018 stated that all discovery requests are to be served on the attorney for defendants and are not to be filed with the court. ECF No. 29 at 4. Accordingly, IT IS HE..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 20, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion for discovery that is currently pending before the court. ECF No. 31. However, the Discovery and Scheduling Order issued on June 21, 2018 stated that all discovery requests are to be served on the attorney for defendants and are not to be filed with the court. ECF No. 29 at 4.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for discovery is denied as improperly filed.
Source: Leagle
