Woodruff v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02678-AC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180803769
Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant's time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 2, 2018 to September 6, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant requests this extension due to her coun
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant's time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 2, 2018 to September 6, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant requests this extension due to her couns..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant's time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 2, 2018 to September 6, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.
Defendant requests this extension due to her counsel's heavy workload for the months of July and August 2018. Defendant's counsel is currently responsible for an appellate brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and over fifty cases in a variety of stages, seven of which require imminent briefing, in the United States District Court for the Districts of Eastern, Northern and Southern California and District of Nevada. In addition, Defendant's counsel will be attending an all-day training on August 2, 2018. Defendant's counsel respectfully requests this additional time to expend the necessary time to review the record and to evaluate the issues Plaintiff raised, and to submit Defendant's response for review by this Court.
The parties further stipulate that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.
The parties stipulate in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
