Buie v. ESA Management, LLC, 2:17-cv-02455 MCE AC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180803773
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's motion to compel a physical examination of plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 35. ECF No. 22. Defendant's motion is set for hearing on August 8, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. The motion and the hearing are hereby VACATED for failure to comply with E.D. Cal. R. 251, which requires discovery motions brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26-37 and 45 to be brought by joint statement, with li
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's motion to compel a physical examination of plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 35. ECF No. 22. Defendant's motion is set for hearing on August 8, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. The motion and the hearing are hereby VACATED for failure to comply with E.D. Cal. R. 251, which requires discovery motions brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26-37 and 45 to be brought by joint statement, with lim..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's motion to compel a physical examination of plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 35. ECF No. 22. Defendant's motion is set for hearing on August 8, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. The motion and the hearing are hereby VACATED for failure to comply with E.D. Cal. R. 251, which requires discovery motions brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26-37 and 45 to be brought by joint statement, with limited exceptions that do not apply here.
Defendant may notice a new motion on the same topic that properly complies with E.D. Cal. R. 251. Only the joint statement and attached exhibits will be considered. The court further cautions defendant to ensure that any renewed motion complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 by providing sufficient information regarding the proposed "time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination" such that, in the event the motion were granted, the court could issue the appropriate order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
