Knapp v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-00773-AWI-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180806610
Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 25) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 2, 2018 to August 8, 2018. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension.
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 25) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 2, 2018 to August 8, 2018. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. C..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(ECF No. 25)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 2, 2018 to August 8, 2018. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel is experiencing migraines on the date of the current filing deadline, which impairs her vision. As such, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Counsel apologizes for the belated request, but did not anticipate having am migraine on the date of the current filing deadline. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
