Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Aguirre v. Vivint Solar Developer, LLC, 1:17-cv-01197-JLT. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180809806 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFF AND HIS COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court referred this matter for arbitration. (Doc. 22) In doing so, the Court stayed the action and ordered that the parties to file a joint report every 120 days. Id. at 10. The defendant filed a unilateral status report (Doc. 23) and the plaintiff has filed nothing. Thus, the Court ORDERS: Within 14 d
More

ORDER TO PLAINTIFF AND HIS COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS

The Court referred this matter for arbitration. (Doc. 22) In doing so, the Court stayed the action and ordered that the parties to file a joint report every 120 days. Id. at 10. The defendant filed a unilateral status report (Doc. 23) and the plaintiff has filed nothing. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

Within 14 days, the plaintiff and his counsel SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions, up to and including dismissal of the action, should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court's orders. Alternatively, within 14 days, they may file a report detailing the status of the arbitration. If, as the defendant indicates (Doc. 23), nothing has occurred, they SHALL explain why.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer