Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McMillan v. Ringler, 2:13-cv-0578 MCE KJN P. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180810796 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file a reply to the opposition filed in response to his motion for leave to supplement his complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 125) is granted; and 2. Plaintiff is granted fourteen days from the date of this order in which to file a reply.

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file a reply to the opposition filed in response to his motion for leave to supplement his complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 125) is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted fourteen days from the date of this order in which to file a reply.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer