Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. v. U S Citylink Corporation, 1:18-cv-00935-AWI-JLT. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180816a29 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [ PROPOSED ] ORDER (Doc. 8) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants U S CITYLINK CORPORATION, a California corporation, and NAVDEEP GREWAL, an individual (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action on July 1
More

STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [ PROPOSED ] ORDER

(Doc. 8)

Plaintiff DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants U S CITYLINK CORPORATION, a California corporation, and NAVDEEP GREWAL, an individual (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action on July 10, 2018;

WHEREAS, Defendants' response to Plaintiff's Complaint was previously due on August 3, 2018;

WHEREAS, the Court previously granted an extension of time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint;

WHEREAS, Defendants' response to Plaintiff's Complaint is currently due on August 24, 2018;

WHEREAS, good cause exists to extend the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint because the parties have reached a settlement in principle and the parties require additional time to document the settlement;

WHEREAS, Eastern District of California Local Rule 144, subdivision (a), allows the parties to stipulate to an extension of time to respond to a complaint no greater than twenty-eight (28) days; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for a period of twenty-one (21) days—to and including September 14, 2018.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants that Defendants shall have an extension of twenty-one (21) days to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint—to and including September 14, 2018.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having considered the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing, hereby ORDERS as follows:

The time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended 21 days— to and including September 14, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer