Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Hernandez, 17-cr-102 TLN. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180816a66 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Cameron Desmond, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Clemente M. Jim nez, Counsel for Adrian Guerrero Hernandez, that the status conference scheduled for August 16, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on August 23, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., for further status conference and an
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Cameron Desmond, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Clemente M. Jiménez, Counsel for Adrian Guerrero Hernandez, that the status conference scheduled for August 16, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on August 23, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., for further status conference and anticipated change of plea. This stipulation applies only to Mr. Guerrero Hernandez, not to the co-defendants.

The government has recently provided defense counsel with a revised plea agreement. Counsel will require additional time to review this new plea agreement with Mr. Guerrero Hernandez.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 et seq. be excluded from computation of time pursuant to Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendant further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter, scheduled for August 16, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to August 23, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., for further status conference. The Court finds that time under the Speedy Trial Act be excluded from computation of time pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendant further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer