Bennett v. Saxton, 2:18-cv-0719 KJM AC P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180821964
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On June 29, 2018, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 10. Petitioner has not responded to the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the service of this order, petitioner shall file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion to dismiss. Failure t
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On June 29, 2018, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 10. Petitioner has not responded to the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the service of this order, petitioner shall file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion to dismiss. Failure to..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 29, 2018, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 10. Petitioner has not responded to the motion.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the service of this order, petitioner shall file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion to dismiss. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Source: Leagle
