U.S. v. Way, 1:14-cr-101 DAD-BAM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180822846
Visitors: 21
Filed: Aug. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The hearing on the defendant's post-trial motions filed herein on August 16, 2018, were recently advanced to October 1, 2018. However, a schedule for filing the government's response and any reply was not set. 2. The parties agree that the government's response to the defendant'
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The hearing on the defendant's post-trial motions filed herein on August 16, 2018, were recently advanced to October 1, 2018. However, a schedule for filing the government's response and any reply was not set. 2. The parties agree that the government's response to the defendant's..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The hearing on the defendant's post-trial motions filed herein on August 16, 2018, were recently advanced to October 1, 2018. However, a schedule for filing the government's response and any reply was not set.
2. The parties agree that the government's response to the defendant's motions shall be filed on or before September 14 and the defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed on or before September 28.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
