Chaudhry v. Smith, 1:16-cv-01243-LJO-SAB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180822861
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2018
Summary: AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION DEADLINE: AUGUST 24, 2018 STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On August 16, 2018, Defendants filed a request for modification of the scheduling order to extend the expert discovery deadline by sixty days. (ECF No. 36.) Defendants state that they have subpoenaed pertinent records from Plaintiffs' experts after an April 9, 2018 order extending the expert discovery deadline and such records have not yet been produc
Summary: AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION DEADLINE: AUGUST 24, 2018 STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On August 16, 2018, Defendants filed a request for modification of the scheduling order to extend the expert discovery deadline by sixty days. (ECF No. 36.) Defendants state that they have subpoenaed pertinent records from Plaintiffs' experts after an April 9, 2018 order extending the expert discovery deadline and such records have not yet been produce..
More
AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION
DEADLINE: AUGUST 24, 2018
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
On August 16, 2018, Defendants filed a request for modification of the scheduling order to extend the expert discovery deadline by sixty days. (ECF No. 36.) Defendants state that they have subpoenaed pertinent records from Plaintiffs' experts after an April 9, 2018 order extending the expert discovery deadline and such records have not yet been produced. (Id.) Defendants state that they have been informed that the documents will be produced on August 20, 2018, the day discovery closes, and need an extension of time to depose Plaintiffs' experts. (Id.) On August 17, 2018, Plaintiffs filed an opposition to the request to extend the discovery deadlines. (ECF No. 38.)
The Court shall provide Defendants with the opportunity to address the issues raised in Plaintiffs' opposition. Specifically, the Court shall require Defendants to address when the subpoenas were issued and the reason that responsive documents were not able to be received prior to the expert discovery cut-off dates.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a reply to Plaintiffs' opposition to the request to modify the scheduling order on or before August 24, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
