Brito v. Sessions, 2:18-cv-97-KJM-DB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180823b30
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2018
Summary: FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . The parties jointly request (ECF Nos. 13-14) to amend dates in the pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 9) by approximately 90 days. Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS this request, as follows: Description Existing Date New Date Initial Disclosures June 5, 2018 September 3, 2018 Discovery Cutoff January 7, 2019 Apr
Summary: FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . The parties jointly request (ECF Nos. 13-14) to amend dates in the pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 9) by approximately 90 days. Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS this request, as follows: Description Existing Date New Date Initial Disclosures June 5, 2018 September 3, 2018 Discovery Cutoff January 7, 2019 Apri..
More
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
The parties jointly request (ECF Nos. 13-14) to amend dates in the pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 9) by approximately 90 days. Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS this request, as follows:
Description Existing Date New Date
Initial Disclosures June 5, 2018 September 3, 2018
Discovery Cutoff January 7, 2019 April 8, 2019
Expert Designations October 12, 2018 January 10, 2019
Rebuttal Expert Designations November 12, 2018 February 11, 2019
Expert Disclosures October 26, 2018 January 24, 2019
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures December 3, 2018 March 4, 2019
Completion of Expert Discovery January 7, 2019 April 8, 2019
All Dispositive Motions Hearing Date March 8, 2019 June 6, 20191
This amendment does not alter any other portions of the initial scheduling order (ECF No. 9).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
Source: Leagle
