Spence v. Kaur, 2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180829854
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. This action proceeds on plaintiff's claim that in 2016, defendant Kaur retaliated against plaintiff at California State Prison, Solano. By order filed March 28, 2018, this action was referred to the post-screening ADR project and stayed pending a settlement conference. The case did not settle. Therefore, the stay of this action is lifted, and defendant Kaur is directed to file a responsive pleadi
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. This action proceeds on plaintiff's claim that in 2016, defendant Kaur retaliated against plaintiff at California State Prison, Solano. By order filed March 28, 2018, this action was referred to the post-screening ADR project and stayed pending a settlement conference. The case did not settle. Therefore, the stay of this action is lifted, and defendant Kaur is directed to file a responsive pleadin..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. This action proceeds on plaintiff's claim that in 2016, defendant Kaur retaliated against plaintiff at California State Prison, Solano. By order filed March 28, 2018, this action was referred to the post-screening ADR project and stayed pending a settlement conference. The case did not settle. Therefore, the stay of this action is lifted, and defendant Kaur is directed to file a responsive pleading within thirty days from the date of this order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The stay of this action is lifted; and
2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, defendant Kauer shall respond to plaintiff's second amended complaint (ECF No. 23).
Source: Leagle
