Soroka v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-01571-GSA. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180830a22
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 30 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. The current due date is August 27, 2018. The new due date will be September 26, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an ext
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 30 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. The current due date is August 27, 2018. The new due date will be September 26, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an exte..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 30 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF
GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. The current due date is August 27, 2018. The new due date will be September 26, 2018.
This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time in this case and the first request for an extension in this case overall. There is good cause for this request. Since the filing of Plaintiff's opening brief, Defendant's counsel was on leave and had planned to address her full workload of district court cases and other cases, including this case, upon her return. However, an unanticipated matter in another district court case that required immediate attention upon Defendant's counsel's return prevented Defendant's counsel from completing Defendant's responsive brief in this case by the original due date.
Thus, Defendant is respectfully requesting additional time up to and including September 26, 2018, to fully review the record and research the issues presented by Plaintiff's opening brief in this case. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
