Salt Creek Media, Inc. v. Marksys, LLC, 2:17-cv-00714-KJN. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180830a60
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . ORDER The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to Modify the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order, and good cause appearing therefor, ORDERS THAT: In light of the Parties signed Stipulation (ECF No. 29), the Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an Order modifying the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order as follows: 1 Law and Motion: January 31, 2019 Fact Discovery: November 2, 2018 Expert
Summary: ORDER TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . ORDER The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to Modify the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order, and good cause appearing therefor, ORDERS THAT: In light of the Parties signed Stipulation (ECF No. 29), the Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an Order modifying the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order as follows: 1 Law and Motion: January 31, 2019 Fact Discovery: November 2, 2018 Expert ..
More
ORDER TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
ORDER
The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to Modify the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order, and good cause appearing therefor,
ORDERS THAT:
In light of the Parties signed Stipulation (ECF No. 29), the Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an Order modifying the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order as follows:1
Law and Motion: January 31, 2019
Fact Discovery: November 2, 2018
Expert Disclosure November 9, 2018
Expert Rebuttal: November 26, 2018
All Expert Discovery: January 11, 2019
The January 24, 2019 final pretrial conference and February 22, 2019 trial are VACATED.
Within fourteen (14) days of the court's resolution of any dispositive motions or the parties notifying the court that no dispositive motions will be filed, the parties shall file a joint statement of trial readiness, outlining: (a) proposed dates for a final pretrial conference and trial that have been cleared with the undersigned's courtroom deputy clerk; (b) whether a settlement conference should be scheduled;2 and (c) any other matters that would aid in the just and expeditious resolution of this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED. This order resolves ECF No. 29.
FootNotes
1. The court has made minor changes to the parties' proposed dates based on the court's schedule and hearing dates.
2. If the parties wish to have an earlier settlement conference with another magistrate judge of this court, the parties shall file a stipulation and proposed order for the court's consideration.
Source: Leagle
