Mendez v. Procter & Gamble Company, 1:17-cv-01170-DAD-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180904841
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On August 3, 2018, the plaintiff notified the Court that the parties had resolved the matter and were finalizing settlement documents. (Doc. 15 at 2) The Court then ordered the parties to file the stipulated dismissal by August 27, 2018. (Doc. 16) This has not occurred. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. Within seven days
Summary: ORDER TO THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On August 3, 2018, the plaintiff notified the Court that the parties had resolved the matter and were finalizing settlement documents. (Doc. 15 at 2) The Court then ordered the parties to file the stipulated dismissal by August 27, 2018. (Doc. 16) This has not occurred. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. Within seven days,..
More
ORDER TO THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On August 3, 2018, the plaintiff notified the Court that the parties had resolved the matter and were finalizing settlement documents. (Doc. 15 at 2) The Court then ordered the parties to file the stipulated dismissal by August 27, 2018. (Doc. 16) This has not occurred. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
1. Within seven days, the parties and their attorneys SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court's order. Alternatively, they may file the stipulated dismissal within seven days.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
