Birdsall v. James, 1:14-cv-01738-DAD-BAM (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180907665
Visitors: 23
Filed: Sep. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT JAMES TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYDEADLINE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff William Birdsall ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's second amended complaint asserting a due process violation claim against Defendant James. On September 5, 2018, the Court denied Defendant's motion to dismiss. (ECF
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT JAMES TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYDEADLINE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff William Birdsall ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's second amended complaint asserting a due process violation claim against Defendant James. On September 5, 2018, the Court denied Defendant's motion to dismiss. (ECF ..
More
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT JAMES TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYDEADLINE
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff William Birdsall ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's second amended complaint asserting a due process violation claim against Defendant James.
On September 5, 2018, the Court denied Defendant's motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 45.) Accordingly, Defendant shall file an answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff's second amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
