U.S. v. Castellanos, 1:15-cr-00027-LJO-SKO. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180914h03
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the sentencing hearing in the above-captioned matter now set for September 24, 2018 may be continued to February 11, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. This continuance is requested by the defense in order to allow Mr. Castellanos to complete his two-year commitment at the Jericho Project. An updated letter from t
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the sentencing hearing in the above-captioned matter now set for September 24, 2018 may be continued to February 11, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. This continuance is requested by the defense in order to allow Mr. Castellanos to complete his two-year commitment at the Jericho Project. An updated letter from th..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the sentencing hearing in the above-captioned matter now set for September 24, 2018 may be continued to February 11, 2019 at 8:30 a.m.
This continuance is requested by the defense in order to allow Mr. Castellanos to complete his two-year commitment at the Jericho Project. An updated letter from the program is attached, noting he remains in compliance with the program since his admission on February 10, 2017.
At this time, the defense would also request the Court refer this matter to probation for a report and recommendation for sentencing and that Mr. Castellanos be allowed to complete the interview telephonically in order to minimize the disruption to his time at the program.
As this is a sentencing hearing and Mr. Castellanos has previously entered his guilty plea, no exclusion of time is necessary under the Speedy Trial Act.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle