Filed: Sep. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR FILING UNDER SEAL MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that documents submitted by the United States, and attached to this Order, are approved by the Court for filing under seal and shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order, but not the attached sealed documents, shall appear on the publicly available case docket. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that access
Summary: ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR FILING UNDER SEAL MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that documents submitted by the United States, and attached to this Order, are approved by the Court for filing under seal and shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order, but not the attached sealed documents, shall appear on the publicly available case docket. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that access t..
More
ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR FILING UNDER SEAL
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that documents submitted by the United States, and attached to this Order, are approved by the Court for filing under seal and shall be SEALED until further order of this Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order, but not the attached sealed documents, shall appear on the publicly available case docket.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the United States until such time as the United States has applied for, and the Court has issued, a protective order permitting disclosure to defendants in United States v. Loya-Solarzano, et al., Case No. 2:18-CR-164-MCE.
The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publishing Co. v. U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in the United States' request, sealing the aforementioned documents serves a compelling interest.
The Court further finds that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interests identified by the United States would be harmed. The Court further finds that there are no additional alternatives to sealing the documents the United States has submitted that would adequately protect the compelling interests identified by the United States.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
