Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Trevino v. Golden State FC, LLC, 1:18-cv-00120-DAD-BAM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180917865 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COMPLETION OF RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION; ORDER BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Juan Trevino ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Golden State FC LLC ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, as set forth below: WHEREAS, the Court, in its August 30, 2018 Minute Order, has ordered the Parties to meet and confer regarding the scheduling o
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COMPLETION OF RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Juan Trevino ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Golden State FC LLC ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, as set forth below:

WHEREAS, the Court, in its August 30, 2018 Minute Order, has ordered the Parties to meet and confer regarding the scheduling of the Parties' previously-noticed depositions of Plaintiff and Defendant's Rule 30(b)(6) designees, and to complete those depositions by September 30, 2018;

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant have met and conferred in good faith in an attempt to schedule the depositions pursuant to the availability of both the deponents and counsel for the Parties, including Rule 30(b)(6) designees who will be traveling from outside of California for the deposition;

WHEREAS, due to the limited availability of the individuals on both sides during the month of September and the need for the Parties to better clarify and/or understand the proposed Rule 30(b)(6) topics so that the correct individuals can be identified as Rule 30(b)(6) designees to the betterment of all Parties, Defendant's Rule 30(b)(6) deposition cannot be completed before September 30, 2018;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's counsel has provided time frames in November when Plaintiff is available for scheduling Defendant's Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, and Defendant has agreed to work with Plaintiff in good faith to schedule its Rule 30(b)(6) designees during those time frames;

THEREFORE, the Parties HEREBY STIPULATE and request, by and through the Parties' respective counsel, that the Court continue the September 30, 2018 deadline for completing the deposition of Defendant's Rule 30(b)(6) designees until November 30, 2018.

The Parties are making this request in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Having read and considered the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Continue Deadline for Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition, and good cause appearing, the Stipulation is approved. The Court hereby orders as follows:

1. The deadline for completing Defendant Golden State FC LLC's Rule 30(b)(6) deposition is continued to November 30, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer