Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Trebas v. Moreno, 1:16-cv-00461-DAD-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180918a13 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 71 (ECF No.) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On September 14, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 71). All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493 , 1506
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 71 (ECF No.)

On September 14, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 71). All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)."). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer