Torres v. Gipson, 1:16-cv-01525-LJO-JLT (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180921942
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (ECF No. 48) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On August 27, 2018, plaintiff moved for an order of the court to set a settlement conference. Defendants have not responded to the request, and the time for responding has now passed. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230( l ). Since defendants have not indicated to the Court that they are willing to participate in a settlement conference., no settlement conference will be scheduled u
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (ECF No. 48) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On August 27, 2018, plaintiff moved for an order of the court to set a settlement conference. Defendants have not responded to the request, and the time for responding has now passed. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230( l ). Since defendants have not indicated to the Court that they are willing to participate in a settlement conference., no settlement conference will be scheduled un..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
(ECF No. 48)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On August 27, 2018, plaintiff moved for an order of the court to set a settlement conference. Defendants have not responded to the request, and the time for responding has now passed. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(l). Since defendants have not indicated to the Court that they are willing to participate in a settlement conference., no settlement conference will be scheduled until such time as the parties agree to participate in one. Therefore, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE plaintiff's motion to set a settlement conference (ECF No. 48).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
