Zaiza v. Guthrie, 1:16-cv-01862-LJO-JLT (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180921943
Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER (1) DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT REQUEST FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (ECF Nos. 35, 37) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On September 5, 2018, the Court ordered the plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to file his pretrial statement. Alternatively, the Court ordered the plaintiff to file the pretrial statement. Plaintiff has now filed a moti
Summary: ORDER (1) DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT REQUEST FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (ECF Nos. 35, 37) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On September 5, 2018, the Court ordered the plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to file his pretrial statement. Alternatively, the Court ordered the plaintiff to file the pretrial statement. Plaintiff has now filed a motio..
More
ORDER
(1) DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE;
(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; AND
(3) DENYING AS MOOT REQUEST FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
(ECF Nos. 35, 37)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On September 5, 2018, the Court ordered the plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to file his pretrial statement. Alternatively, the Court ordered the plaintiff to file the pretrial statement.
Plaintiff has now filed a motion for extension of time to file his pretrial statement because he claims he was recently transferred to another institution and he "is having difficulties in getting into the prison's law library." (ECF No. 37.) While the docket reflects a Notice of Change of Address was filed on August 30, 2018, plaintiff does not explain why he was unable to meet the original August 16, 2018, filing deadline for the pretrial statement. Thus, there is not good cause to grant plaintiff's motion.
Plaintiff has also filed a document requesting a settlement, which the Court construes as a motion for a settlement conference. (ECF No. 35.) Because this matter is already set for a settlement conference on October 5, 2018, plaintiff's motion is denied as moot. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1. The September 5, 2018, Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 31) is DISCHARGED;
2. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 37) is DENIED;
3. Plaintiff SHALL file his pretrial statement on or before September 26, 2018. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this deadline may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. Defendants shall file their pretrial statement on or before October 5, 2018;
4. Plaintiff's motion for a settlement conference (ECF No. 35) is DENIED as moot; and
5. The Clerk of Court shall provide via fax or email a copy of this order to the Litigation Coordinator at California State Prison in Corcoran, California for personal delivery to the plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
