K.V. ex rel. Vang v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-0168-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180924731
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 18) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On September 21, 2018, Defendant filed a motion for a two-day extension of time to serve a response to Plaintiff's opening brief, reporting counsel "was recently reassigned this case and erred in determining the due date" (Doc. 18 at 1) In addition, Defendant filed a proof of service, indicating and the response has now been served. (Doc. 19) Plaintiff had no objection to the delay
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 18) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On September 21, 2018, Defendant filed a motion for a two-day extension of time to serve a response to Plaintiff's opening brief, reporting counsel "was recently reassigned this case and erred in determining the due date" (Doc. 18 at 1) In addition, Defendant filed a proof of service, indicating and the response has now been served. (Doc. 19) Plaintiff had no objection to the delay...
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 18)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On September 21, 2018, Defendant filed a motion for a two-day extension of time to serve a response to Plaintiff's opening brief, reporting counsel "was recently reassigned this case and erred in determining the due date" (Doc. 18 at 1) In addition, Defendant filed a proof of service, indicating and the response has now been served. (Doc. 19) Plaintiff had no objection to the delay. (Doc. 18 at 1)
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: Defendant's motion for an extension of time (Doc. 18) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
